[Home ] [Archive]    
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Home::
Archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Principles of Transparency::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Committed to

AWT IMAGE

Attribution-NonCommercial
CC BY-NC


AWT IMAGE

Open Access Publishing


AWT IMAGE

Prevent Plagiarism

..
Registered in


..
Statistics
Journal volumes: 17
Journal issues: 34
Articles views: 683905
Articles downloads: 342215

Total authors: 581
Unique authors: 422
Repeated authors: 159
Repeated authors percent: 27

Submitted articles: 368
Accepted articles: 266
Rejected articles: 25
Published articles: 219

Acceptance rate: 72.28
Rejection rate: 6.79

Average Time to Accept: 282 days
Average Time to First Review: 27.2 days
Average Time to Publish: 26.1 days

Last 3 years statistics:
Submitted articles: 54
Accepted articles: 37
Rejected articles: 6
Published articles: 17

Acceptance rate: 68.52
Rejection rate: 11.11

Average Time to Accept: 205 days
Average Time to First Review: 6.7 days
Average Time to Publish: 118 days
____
..
:: Volume 1, Issue 2 (3-2005) ::
JSRI 2005, 1(2): 109-122 Back to browse issues page
Row and Column Elimination Sampling Design +1 and its Efficiencies
M. Salehi M 1, A. Jamalzadeh
1- , salehi_m@cc.iut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (3470 Views)

Extended Abstract. It is a traditional way in biological, sociological, agricultural and geological studies to partition a geographical area into quadrats and then take a sample of them by a particular sampling design. We study the relevant characteristic of quadrats to estimate a parameter of the population. We suppose that the variable of interest has a positive spatial autocorrelation. Sampling designs which produce an appropriate coverage of the population will increase the precision of the parameter estimator, (Schreuder et al, 1993).

Hájek (1959), under a model with a positive spatial autocorrelation, illustrated that the systematic sampling is an optimum sampling design for one dimensional population. However, systematic and stratified samplings with only one sample in each stratum, are two traditional sampling designs that cover the population region well (McKenzie et al, 1991). Unfortunately, there is no unbiased estimator for these two sampling designs. Simple Latin Square Sampling (SLSS) design is another design which provides a good coverage for population. Also, this design has no variance estimator and it is considered as a weak point in practice. Munholland and Borkowski, (1995) introduced Simple Latin Square Sampling +1 (SLSS+1). They suggest that taking one additional sampling unit helps to provide an unbiased variance estimator. However, two other problems still exist concerning SLSS and SLSS+1. The population has to be a square and also the sample size be restricted to square root of the population size.

Salehi (2002) introduced Systematic Simple Latin Square Sampling (SSLSS) for...[To continue please click here]

Keywords: Latin Square Sampling Design, Horvitz-Thompson Estimator, Autocorrelation Coeficient, Spatial Data Analysi
Full-Text [PDF 381 kb]   (832 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2016/02/9 | Accepted: 2016/02/9 | Published: 2016/02/9
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Salehi M M, Jamalzadeh A. Row and Column Elimination Sampling Design +1 and its Efficiencies. JSRI 2005; 1 (2) :109-122
URL: http://jsri.srtc.ac.ir/article-1-145-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 2 (3-2005) Back to browse issues page
مجله‌ی پژوهش‌های آماری ایران Journal of Statistical Research of Iran JSRI
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 42 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645