[Home ] [Archive]    
Main Menu
Journal Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Principles of Transparency::
Contact us::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Committed to




Open Access Publishing


Prevent Plagiarism

Registered in

Journal volumes: 17
Journal issues: 34
Articles views: 645775
Articles downloads: 299456

Total authors: 581
Unique authors: 422
Repeated authors: 159
Repeated authors percent: 27

Submitted articles: 368
Accepted articles: 266
Rejected articles: 25
Published articles: 219

Acceptance rate: 72.28
Rejection rate: 6.79

Average Time to Accept: 282 days
Average Time to First Review: 27.2 days
Average Time to Publish: 26.1 days

Last 3 years statistics:
Submitted articles: 77
Accepted articles: 52
Rejected articles: 12
Published articles: 24

Acceptance rate: 67.53
Rejection rate: 15.58

Average Time to Accept: 201 days
Average Time to First Review: 11.4 days
Average Time to Publish: 139.4 days
:: Volume 2, Issue 2 (3-2006) ::
JSRI 2006, 2(2): 107-128 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Small Area Estimation Methods for Estimating Unemployment Rate
Arman Bidarbakht­nia , Roshanak Ali­akbari Saba 1
1- , r_ aliakbari@sci.org.ir
Abstract:   (2895 Views)

Extended Abstract. In recent years, needs for small area estimations have been greatly increased for large surveys particularly household surveys in Sta­ tistical Centre of Iran (SCI), because of the costs and respondent burden. The lack of suitable auxiliary variables between two decennial housing and popula­ tion census is a challenge for SCI in using these methods.

In general, the small area estimators can be classified into three categories: direct estimators, indirect estimators, and their combination.

The direct estimators are those estimators using just data falling into small areas for estimating parameter of interest in small areas. The indirect estimators use data collected from both small areas of interest and other areas to estimate the parameters.

The small area estimators used in this paper are indirect estimators with a combination of direct and indirect estimators. Three well­known small area estimators, i.e. synthetic estimator, composite estimator, and adjusted regression estimator are introduced and calculated under various conditions.

First, a linear systematic sample with a size of 15,400 was selected from active population in the 1996 Census at 0.95 confidence level and a 0.05 maximum relative error.

To calculate quality indices in order to assess small area estimators, 1000 sample were selected from the population. Sample size in each province (small area) is a random variable since it varies in each replication. Since the employment information has been collected in the 1996 Census, the true unemployment rate is known for each province.

The small area estimators use auxiliary variables from previous census or large scale surveys and because of the long intercensal period, auxiliary variables tend to be out of date. So, for evaluating the effect of out­of­date auxiliary variables on performance of small area estimators, auxiliary variables of 1986 Census were used. For this purpose we have used suitable auxiliary variables from 1986 Census file in each province.

There are four quality measures for comparison of small area methods, including bias, mean squared error (MSE), average of relative errors (ARE), and average of squared errors (ASE).

Using these measures, four estimators are chosen as the selected methods:

  • p(C­Sy­Av): Composite estimator with synthetic estimator and mean of group weights,
  • p(C­Al­Av): Composite estimator with synthetic alternative estimator and mean of group weights,
  • p(JS­Sy): James­Stein estimator with synthetic estimator, and
  • p(JS­Al): James­Stein estimator with synthetic alternative estimator.

MSE charts show that if we assign a fixed value as a minimum sample size in each small area, we can always be assure to have acceptable MSE's in using the above methods. Also p(JS­Al) leads to smaller values of ARE and ASE, and in maximum relative error point of view, p(C­Al­Av) has smaller values than the other selected estimators.

Keywords: design­based estimators, small area estimation, unemployment rate, post­stratum.
Full-Text [PDF 665 kb]   (932 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2016/02/10 | Accepted: 2016/02/10 | Published: 2016/02/10
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bidarbakht­nia A, Ali­akbari Saba R. Comparison of Small Area Estimation Methods for Estimating Unemployment Rate. JSRI 2006; 2 (2) :107-128
URL: http://jsri.srtc.ac.ir/article-1-152-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 2, Issue 2 (3-2006) Back to browse issues page
مجله‌ی پژوهش‌های آماری ایران Journal of Statistical Research of Iran JSRI
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 42 queries by YEKTAWEB 4624