[Home ] [Archive]    
Main Menu
Journal Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Principles of Transparency::
Contact us::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Committed to




Open Access Publishing


Prevent Plagiarism

Registered in

Journal volumes: 17
Journal issues: 34
Articles views: 645775
Articles downloads: 299456

Total authors: 581
Unique authors: 422
Repeated authors: 159
Repeated authors percent: 27

Submitted articles: 368
Accepted articles: 266
Rejected articles: 25
Published articles: 219

Acceptance rate: 72.28
Rejection rate: 6.79

Average Time to Accept: 282 days
Average Time to First Review: 27.2 days
Average Time to Publish: 26.1 days

Last 3 years statistics:
Submitted articles: 77
Accepted articles: 52
Rejected articles: 12
Published articles: 24

Acceptance rate: 67.53
Rejection rate: 15.58

Average Time to Accept: 201 days
Average Time to First Review: 11.4 days
Average Time to Publish: 139.4 days
:: Volume 16, Issue 1 (9-2019) ::
JSRI 2019, 16(1): 211-228 Back to browse issues page
The Ability of Artificial Neural Networks in Learning Dependency of Spatial Data‎
Abbas Tavasoli , Yadollah Waghei 1, Alireza Nazemi
1- , ywaghei@birjand.ac.ir
Abstract:   (788 Views)
 ‎In conventional methods of spatial data analysis‎, ‎such as Kriging‎, ‎the dependency structure of data is estimated‎, ‎modeled‎, ‎and then used for data prediction‎. ‎In contrast‎, ‎the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach‎, ‎which is a data-driven approach‎, ‎does not model the data dependency structure‎. ‎Therefore‎, ‎an important question may arise here‎: ‎Does ANN use‎, ‎indirectly‎, ‎spatial dependency structure in data prediction? In this paper‎, ‎we want to answer this question through a simulation study‎. ‎Different dependent and independent spatial data sets are simulated under two spatial structures‎, ‎and the prediction accuracy of ANNs is compared for simulated data‎. ‎It is shown that neural network error for predicting dependent spatial data is much less than that of independent spatial data‎. ‎We conclude that the network can indirectly learn spatial dependence between the observations‎. ‎We also applied the ANN method to an experimentally obtained data set and compared its prediction accuracy with Kriging as a common geostatistical method‎. ‎The results showed that the neural network can be used as an alternative method for spatial data prediction.‎
Keywords: Artificial Neural Networks, Spatial dependency, Spatial prediction.‎
Full-Text [PDF 3685 kb]   (307 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2020/08/4 | Accepted: 2021/01/2 | Published: 2019/09/19
1. Bishop‎, ‎C‎. ‎M‎. ‎(1995)‎. Neural networks for pattern recognition‎. ‎Oxford university‎ ‎press‎.
2. ‎Bishop‎, ‎C‎. ‎M‎. ‎(2006)‎. ‎Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning‎. ‎Springer-Verlag‎, ‎New York‎.
3. ‎Broomhead‎, ‎D‎. ‎S‎. ‎and Lowe‎, ‎D‎. ‎(1988)‎. ‎Radial Basis Functions‎, ‎Multi-variable‎ ‎Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks‎. ‎Technical report‎, ‎Royal Signals‎ ‎and Radar Establishment Malvern (United Kingdom)‎.
4. ‎Carlin‎, ‎B‎. ‎P.‎, ‎Gelfand‎, ‎A‎. ‎E.‎, ‎and Banerjee‎, ‎S‎. ‎(2014)‎. Hierarchical Modeling and‎ ‎Analysis for Spatial Data. Chapman and Hall/CRC‎.
5. ‎Chung‎, ‎C‎. ‎H.‎, ‎Chiang‎, ‎Y‎. ‎M.‎, ‎and Chang‎, ‎E‎. ‎J‎. ‎(2012)‎. ‎A Spatial Neural Fuzzy‎ ‎Network for Estimating Pan Evaporation at Ungauged Sites‎. Hydrology and‎ ‎Earth System Sciences‎, 16‎, ‎255-266‎. [DOI:10.5194/hess-16-255-2012]
6. ‎Cressie‎, ‎N‎. ‎A‎. ‎C‎. ‎(1993)‎. Statistics for Spatial Data‎. ‎Wiley Series in Probability‎ ‎and Mathematical Statistics‎. ‎John Wiley & Sons‎, ‎Inc‎.
7. ‎Diggle‎, ‎P‎. ‎J‎. ‎and Ribeiro‎, ‎P‎. ‎J‎. ‎(2007)‎. Model-based Geostatistics. Springer Series‎ ‎in Statistics‎.
8. ‎Gelfand‎, ‎A‎. ‎E.‎, ‎Diggle‎, ‎P.‎, ‎Guttorp‎, ‎P.‎, ‎and Fuentes‎, ‎M‎. ‎(2010)‎. Handbook of Spatial‎ ‎Statistics‎. ‎CRC press‎.
9. ‎Gumus‎, ‎K‎. ‎and Sen‎, ‎A‎. ‎(2013)‎. ‎Comparison of Spatial Interpolation Methods and‎ ‎Multi-layer Neural Networks for Different Point Distributions on a Digital Elevation‎ ‎Model‎. ‎Geodetski Vestnik‎, ‎pages 523-543‎. [DOI:10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2013.03.523-543]
10. ‎Hristopulos‎, ‎D‎. ‎T‎. ‎(2020)‎. Random Fields for Spatial Data Modeling‎. ‎Springer‎.
11. ‎Kanevsky‎, ‎M.‎, ‎Arutyunyan‎, ‎R.‎, ‎Bolshov‎, ‎L.‎, ‎Demyanov‎, ‎V.‎, ‎and Maignan‎, ‎M‎. ‎(1996)‎. ‎Artificial Neural Networks and Spatial Estimation of Chernobyl Fallout‎. ‎7‎, ‎5-11‎. [DOI:10.6010/geoinformatics1990.7.1-2_5]
12. ‎Khashei-Siuki‎, ‎A‎. ‎and Sarbazi‎, ‎M‎. ‎(2015)‎. ‎Evaluation of ANFIS‎, ‎ANN‎, ‎and Geostatistical‎ ‎Models to Spatial Distribution of Groundwater Quality (Case Study‎: ‎Mashhad Plain in Iran)‎. Arabian Journal of Geosciences‎, 8‎, ‎903-912‎. [DOI:10.1007/s12517-013-1179-8]
13. ‎Li‎, ‎J‎. ‎and Heap‎, ‎A‎. ‎D‎. ‎(2011)‎. ‎A Review of Comparative Studies of Spatial Interpolation‎ ‎Methods in Environmental Sciences‎: ‎Performance and Impact Factors‎. Ecological Informatics‎, 6‎, ‎228-241‎. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.12.003]
14. ‎Lin‎, ‎G.-F‎. ‎and Chen‎, ‎L.-H‎. ‎(2004)‎. ‎A Spatial Interpolation Method based on Radial‎ ‎Basis Function Networks Incorporating a Semivariogram Model‎. Journal of‎ ‎Hydrology‎, 288‎, ‎288-298‎. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.008]
15. ‎Matheron‎, ‎G‎. ‎(1963)‎. ‎Principles of geostatistics‎. Economic Geology‎, 58‎, ‎1246-1266‎. [DOI:10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246]
16. ‎Matias‎, ‎J‎. ‎M.‎, ‎Vaamonde‎, ‎A.‎, ‎Taboada‎, ‎J.‎, ‎and Gonzalez-Manteiga‎, ‎W‎. ‎(2004)‎. ‎Comparison of Kriging and Neural Networks with Application to the Exploitation‎ ‎of a Slate Mine‎. Mathematical Geology‎, 36‎, ‎463-486‎. [DOI:10.1023/B:MATG.0000029300.66381.dd]
17. ‎McCulloch‎, ‎W‎. ‎S‎. ‎and Pitts‎, ‎W‎. ‎(1943)‎. ‎A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent‎ ‎in Nervous Activity‎. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics‎, 5‎, ‎115-133‎. [DOI:10.1007/BF02478259]
18. ‎Mojiri‎, ‎A.‎, ‎Waghei‎, ‎Y.‎, ‎Sani‎, ‎H‎. ‎N.‎, ‎and Borzadaran‎, ‎G‎. ‎M‎. ‎(2018)‎. ‎Comparison of‎ ‎Predictions by Kriging and Spatial Autoregressive Models‎. Communications in‎ ‎Statistics-Simulation and Computation‎, 47‎, ‎1785-1795‎. [DOI:10.1080/03610918.2017.1324980]
19. ‎Morris‎, ‎T‎. ‎P.‎, ‎White‎, ‎I‎. ‎R.‎, ‎and Crowther‎, ‎M‎. ‎J‎. ‎(2019)‎. ‎Using Simulation Studies‎ ‎to Evaluate Statistical Methods‎. ‎Statistics in Medicine‎.
20. ‎Ojha‎, ‎V‎. ‎K.‎, ‎Abraham‎, ‎A.‎, ‎and Snasel‎, ‎V‎. ‎(2017)‎. ‎Metaheuristic Design of Feedforward ‎Neural Networks‎: ‎A Review of Two Decades of Research‎. Engineering ‎Applications of Artificial Intelligence‎, 60‎, ‎97-116‎. [DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2017.01.013]
21. ‎Poggio‎, ‎T‎. ‎and Girosi‎, ‎F‎. ‎(1989)‎. ‎A Theory of Networks for Approximation and ‎Learning‎. ‎Technical Report‎, ‎Massachusetts Inst of Tech Cambridge Artificial‎ ‎Intelligence Lab‎.
22. ‎Ripley‎, ‎B‎. ‎D‎. ‎(1987)‎. ‎Stochastic Simulation‎, ‎volume 5‎. ‎Wiley Online Library‎.
23. ‎Ripley‎, ‎B‎. ‎D‎. ‎(2007)‎. ‎Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks‎. ‎Cambridge University‎ ‎press‎.
24. ‎Rosenblatt‎, ‎F‎. ‎(1958)‎. ‎The Perceptron‎: ‎a Probabilistic Model for Information Storage‎ ‎and Organization in the Brain‎. Psychological Review‎, 65‎, ‎386‎. [DOI:10.1037/h0042519]
25. ‎Rumelhart‎, ‎D‎. ‎E.‎, ‎Hinton‎, ‎G‎. ‎E.‎, ‎and Williams‎, ‎R‎. ‎J‎. ‎(1986)‎. ‎Learning Representations‎ ‎by Back-propagating Errors‎. Nature‎, 323‎, ‎533-536‎. [DOI:10.1038/323533a0]
26. ‎Samarasinghe‎, ‎S‎. ‎(2016)‎. Neural Networks for Applied Sciences and Engineering‎: ‎from Fundamentals to Complex Pattern Recognition‎. ‎Auerbach Publications‎.
27. ‎Seo‎, ‎Y.‎, ‎Kim‎, ‎S.‎, ‎and Singh‎, ‎V‎. ‎P‎. ‎(2015)‎. ‎Estimating Spatial Precipitation Using ‎Regression Kriging and Artificial Neural Network Residual Kriging (RKNNRK)‎ ‎Hybrid Approach‎. Water Resources Management‎, 29‎, ‎2189-2204‎. [DOI:10.1007/s11269-015-0935-9]
28. ‎Webster‎, ‎R‎. ‎and Oliver‎, ‎M‎. ‎A‎. ‎(2007)‎. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists‎. ‎Number 2‎. ‎John Wiley & Sons‎.
29. ‎Werbos‎, ‎P‎. ‎(1974)‎. ‎Beyond Regression‎: ‎New Tools for Prediction and Analysis in the ‎Behavioral Sciences‎. ‎Ph‎. ‎D‎. ‎dissertation‎, ‎Harvard University‎.
30. ‎Widrow‎, ‎B‎. ‎and Hoff‎, ‎M‎. ‎E‎. ‎(1960)‎. ‎Adaptive Switching Circuits‎. [DOI:10.21236/AD0241531]
31. ‎Yeh‎, ‎I.-C.‎, ‎Huang‎, ‎K.-C.‎, ‎and Kuo‎, ‎Y.-H‎. ‎(2013)‎. ‎Spatial Interpolation Using‎ ‎MLP-RBFN hybrid networks‎. International Journal of Geographical Information‎ ‎Science‎, 27‎, ‎1884-1901‎. [DOI:10.1080/13658816.2013.769050]
32. ‎Zimmerman‎, ‎D.‎, ‎Pavlik‎, ‎C.‎, ‎and Ruggles‎, ‎A‎. ‎(1999)‎. ‎An Experimental Comparaison‎ ‎of Ordinary and Universal Kriging and Distance Weighting‎. ‎pdf‎. ‎Mathematical‎ ‎Geology‎.
33. ‎Zimmerman‎, ‎D‎. ‎L‎. ‎and Zimmerman‎, ‎M‎. ‎B‎. ‎(1991)‎. ‎A Comparison of Spatial Semivariogram‎ ‎Estimators and Corresponding Ordinary Kriging Predictors‎. ‎Technometrics‎, 33‎, ‎77-91‎. [DOI:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484771]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tavasoli A, Waghei Y, Nazemi A. The Ability of Artificial Neural Networks in Learning Dependency of Spatial Data‎. JSRI 2019; 16 (1) :211-228
URL: http://jsri.srtc.ac.ir/article-1-356-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 16, Issue 1 (9-2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله‌ی پژوهش‌های آماری ایران Journal of Statistical Research of Iran JSRI
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 42 queries by YEKTAWEB 4624